If I were to purchase only one setup, it would be the TrueRife F-117. It is a well-made device, incorporating an Antlier Robin F-110 generator, and is capable of handling nearly any health situation you can throw at it.
It comes standard with a hand-held spiral bulb. Skip that bulb and order instead the Vortex Detonator bulb. I have had my Vortex bulb filled with the new, experimental Q-2 gas, but I am not yet sure this is worth the additional cost.
I bought a clamp and tripod to hold the Vortex bulb, very helpful if running long frequency programs or overnight treatment sets. Also purchased the Matrix foot plate, a required grounding device if I want to use the bulb touching my body (as opposed to placing near me but not touching me).
To complete this set up, I have the detoxification footbath, now known as the Ion Pro Wave. I bought none of the assorted attachments, such as the water heater or timer.
The overwhelming majority of readers will be well-served by this setup. It is not inexpensive, but it is versatile and dependable.
The TrueRife organization engages in constant product introduction and upgrading, as well as research which they willingly share with the community. They have the ability to ship out your order nearly overnight, whereas other organizations may take a number of weeks to fill your order. If you are seriously ill and need something now, not having
to wait weeks for a device is reassuring.
I like the fact that when you call their phone number, someone is always available to offer support and assistance. I am especially comforted by the fact that they have a substantial number of units in use, providing a good database against which to test frequencies.
What I don't like is that a newcomer to frequency technology is easily overwhelmed by the confusing array of products offered. I feel a number of these are over-merchandised and lack sufficient supportive research.
Specifically:
I am unconvinced the GRS scanner is a worthwhile investment, and have stated I have yet to find any device that can consistently and accurately determine the frequencies needed in any given situation. I personally feel I can do a much better job with my pendulum, which is certainly less expensive.
The dual-function TrueRife Ozone Plasmasphere looks appealing in photos and sounds great on paper, but it produces a concentration of ozone far below what is usually considered necessary for therapeutic results.
The spiral bulb (standard when ordering the F-117) is substantially less powerful than the Vortex bulb. The site has photos of various people holding the spiral bulb against their head, but this is no reason to buy a bulb of limited power.
Because there are so many bulbs from which to choose, it is necessary to discuss these at some additional length,
The plain gas double bubble bulb is more penetrating than the spiral bulb, but not as powerful as the plain gas Vortex Detonator. The Vortex is also my choice over the double bubble bulb filled with the new Q-2 gas, with or without the accelerator/amplifier shield. Until proven otherwise, I would stick with the Vortex bulb. You don't need any of the others. They are just collecting
dust in my lab.
| Bottom line on bulbs: |
The Vortex bulb seems powerful enough to handle any situation, and more, I suspect, is simply overkill. Further research may prove me wrong, but for now, I don't think anything else offers a choice worth the difference in cost. Get the Vortex Detonator only. |
| Bottom line on gases: |
Presently, I am the only person to use the Vortex bulb with both the conventional gas and the new Quantum gas mixture. I cannot tell you yet which gas is the better of the two- if indeed there is any difference of one over the other except for cost. I have the Q-2 gas only for experimental purposes, and will have the bulb refilled with the original gas if
that proves to be the stronger of the two. I will update this site as soon as there are clear answers. |
There are other devices available similar to the F-117 that are used and loved by those who own them. Wonderful reports abound concerning the GB4000, for example, and many users adore their various ENEM devices..
I have said I would only recommend what I personally knew to be effective. After extensive testing, I am completely satisfied with the results obtained with the F-117, and feel the average individual would have no trouble using it.
If you have a favorite and can back up your experience with documentation, write to me and let me know. I will give it a fair evaluation and present your information at this site. The more input we have, the wiser will be our decisions. |