 |
 |
Here is What I use Most |
 |
Here is What I use Most |
Nearly every day I am asked what particular piece of equipment I recommend most, or what I use for myself and my loved ones. I have explained in the preceding sections that each type of device has its indications, advantages and disadvantages. I own and regularly use each piece I have described, and hope you will read the sections discussing audio, pad and plasma approaches if you have not already done so. For yourself, you don't need all the "stuff" I have described. Essentially I work with two systems. Here is what I use and how I use it: SYSTEM #1- F-117 Generator (with footbath)
The TrueRife organization engages in constant product introduction and upgrading, as well as research which they willingly share with the community. They have the ability to ship out your order nearly overnight, whereas other organizations may take a number of weeks to fill your order. If you are seriously ill and need something now, not having to wait weeks for a device is reassuring. I like the fact that when you call their phone number, someone is always available to offer support and assistance. I am especially comforted by the fact that they have a substantial number of units in use, providing a good database against which to test frequencies. What I don't like is that a newcomer to frequency technology is easily overwhelmed by the confusing array of products offered. I feel a number of these are over-merchandised and lack sufficient supportive research. Specifically: I am unconvinced the GRS scanner is a worthwhile investment, and have stated I have yet to find any device that can consistently and accurately determine the frequencies needed in any given situation. I personally feel I can do a much better job with my pendulum, which is certainly less expensive. The dual-function TrueRife Ozone Plasmasphere looks appealing in photos and sounds great on paper, but it produces a concentration of ozone far below what is usually considered necessary for therapeutic results. The spiral bulb (standard when ordering the F-117) is substantially less powerful than the Vortex bulb. The site has photos of various people holding the spiral bulb against their head, but this is no reason to buy a bulb of limited power. Because there are so many bulbs from which to choose, it is necessary to discuss these at some additional length, The plain gas double bubble bulb is more penetrating than the spiral bulb, but not as powerful as the plain gas Vortex Detonator. The Vortex is also my choice over the double bubble bulb filled with the new Q-2 gas, with or without the accelerator/amplifier shield. Until proven otherwise, I would stick with the Vortex bulb. You don't need any of the others. They are just collecting dust in my lab.
There are other devices available similar to the F-117 that are used and loved by those who own them. Wonderful reports abound concerning the GB4000, for example, and many users adore their various ENEM devices.. I have said I would only recommend what I personally knew to be effective. After extensive testing, I am completely satisfied with the results obtained with the F-117, and feel the average individual would have no trouble using it. If you have a favorite and can back up your experience with documentation, write to me and let me know. I will give it a fair evaluation and present your information at this site. The more input we have, the wiser will be our decisions. ***************************************** SYSTEM #2- Antlier-Robin F-165 Generator and ABPA Black Box Running in the "background" of my lab is the other system I use regularly. It is an F-165 Antlier-Robin generator powering an ABPA black box. I have 5 such setups, and use this configuration to run what I call "core" treatment sets for myself or any person I would treat "at a distance". The two systems are not interchangeable. The F-165/ABPA can duplicate some of the functions I accomplish with the .F-117 system, but not all. The reverse is also true: You cannot treat distant patients with the F-117 system as you can with an F-165/ABPA. Unfortunately, once again there is danger at the intersection where making money meets rational choice of equipment. If you type in Advanced Bio-photon Analyzer on Google, the next screen brings up a large number of sites making unsubstantiated claims and "overselling" products you don't need.
Any web site that features the ABPA instrument also features a green power grid, a cable you can wrap around vegetables, a special enhancing disk, and an ever increasing array of gadgets to make the ABPA more effective. The inevitable question arises: "If this simple 'Black Box' is so effective and powerful, wouldn't it be great if we could make it even more effective and powerful?" I would change the question by asking, "If this simple 'Black Box' is so effective and powerful, why don't we just leave it as it is?" Rapturous claims are made that all you have to do is turn it on and it will cleanse your body of toxins, reduce the stress in your life, and a whole host of other essential functions. Sad to say, but it ain't happened to me yet. I was a not an un-believer until I did my first detoxing foot bath. What I saw in the water was all the proof I needed that the ABPA was falling somewhat short of some of its claims. So here is what I think is true:
I use the combination of an F-165 and ABPA all the time. Because of the nature of my work, I have five such set-ups, at about $3,000.00 per set-up. If cost is not a factor, the decision should be based on how you will employ these devices. If treating yourself or others at a distance is not important, don't get this equipment.
My best advice over 43 years of private practice: "Keep it simple, and 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it.' |
|||||||||||||||||
